Harry Potter vs Twilight
Rachael | February 17, 2010
There ought to be no competition here as Harry Potter is clearly the winner. No book or movie has created more hysteria than this. The world seemed to have turned upside down when the books were released exciting both kids and adults alike. And what can be said about Daniel Radcliffe? He’s a teenage phenomenon who has girls from practically every continent swooning. The same can’t be said for Robert Pattison a.k.a Edward Cullen though. He is popular no doubt but nowhere near Radcliffe in terms of fan base and that of course, should be credited to the role he played.
Daniel Radcliffe and Emma Watson (Hermoine Granger) are easily the highest earning kids on the block. Coming back to the books, Harry Potter is by far ahead in the lead. It is a book with deep symbolisms and life lessons. It is about unity, standing up for your friends, for what is right and it is about the ultimate victory of good over evil. On the other hand, Twilight is nothing but a mindless romance between teens with no substantial message at all. It all revolves around a brainless school girl whom all boys seem to fall in love with, two of whom happen to be dangerous, mythical creatures.
Twilight is basically about a stupid girl without any personality whereas Harry Potter has very human, complex and believable characters. In terms of the movies, Harry Potter again scores better as it has amazing, exciting action sequences and can at times be scary too. Twilight’s saving grace is perhaps the hotness quotient of the male actors and the chemistry between Pattison and Stewart.
Of the latter could be alluded to the fact that there isn’t much to portray anyway excepting blank, mysterious expressions. The current box office also gives evidence to the fact that Harry Potter being the bigger grosser with The Half-Blood Prince already on its way to replace Twilight as the fastest selling in terms of advance ticketing. The 7th book in the HP series is to be made in 2 parts which is understandable considering they need to develop the plot better. There’s so much to be included that no way can so much be packed into just 2 hours. In conclusion, considering all factors such as depth of plot, star power of the cast and box office success it cannot be denied that Harry Potter is indeed the winner in this battle.
I think twilight is more popular as compared with harry
twilight news | March 8, 2010I think twilight is more popular as compared with harry porter since harry porter is for children .
Point 1.) The title of a book, be it
Are you kidding, previous commentor? | July 27, 2010Point 1.) The title of a book, be it Twilight or Harry Potter, should always be capitalized.
2.) It is spelled Potter, not Porter (rereading work is a good thing when trying to get a message across)
3.) Yes, I can definitely see what you mean, Harry Potter is definitely a children’s book, what with all the murder, kidnapping, and martyrdom within… Did you read past the second novel, I wonder…
@twilight news - I disagree. Harry Potter has charmed adults
Nicola | July 29, 2010@twilight news – I disagree. Harry Potter has charmed adults and children alike, and is for both genders of people. Twilight, on the other hand, is for teen girls and mums. The whole Twilight thing has bothered me in ways that I haven’t been able to put into words. But thank goodness for Stephen King, who said:
“Harry Potter is about confronting fears, finding inner strength and doing what is right in the face of adversity. Twilight is about how important it is to have a boyfriend.”
Harry Potter has loads of things happening that some children wouldn’t be able to keep track of, and wouldn’t be able to read it as well without an adult who has an understanding and a love for Harry Potter. So you can’t say that Harry Potter is just for children.
What’s more, Harry Potter is very descriptive of everything and you can picture yourself there watching everything happen, with a vivid view of it all. Whereas Twilight is unable to describe anything except Edward’s chiselled jawline. Of all the things Stephanie Meyer could describe, like what Bella’s non-vampire friends could look like, she describes Edward’s JAWLINE. And then she goes and describes every atom of his perfect face. Surely we could’ve got it the first time. And yet she harps on and on about it the whole book.
I respect your opinion, but in the face of quality, I believe Harry Potter wins, hands down.